I appear to be moving through a bit of a fog the last few days, quite drained of energy. Not sure why, but it’s brought my NaNo efforts (and apparently, also my blog entries) to a screaming halt.
Here’s a token for today, care of Ian Weir’s Daniel O’Thunder which is full of beautiful prose.
It’s to his friends he’s saying things. He’s saying them in private, but of course nothing stays private for long, does it? Not in the world we live in, no indeed. And not when a man keeps his ears to the ground. Both ears fixed firmly to the ground, Daniel, for this has always been my way. Consecutively, of course, not simultaneously, which would involve an anatomical impossibility. (p. 183)
Now, if I think about that, I’m sure I’d have something to say about privacy, humour in literature, narrative voice, or some such. However, I really feel too blurry for any such contemplations. Instead, why don’t you tell me what you think? What does that quote make you ponder?

The readers’ bargain June 10, 2010
Tags: bargain, contract, Daniel O'Thunder, devil, evil, Ian Weir, reading, writing
It is an interesting bargain that is struck between writer and reader. The reader agrees to suspend belief, so long as the writer crafts a believable world. The art is taking the reader on a journey of the imagination that stretches so tightly it almost snaps. When the leap is too great, the reader puts down the book in disgust and may not return to it.
Ian Weir’s Daniel O’Thunder is a lovely book. I don’t want to mislead you into thinking it is full of sweetness and light, because it is a dark book full of poverty, murder, shame and the blackness of evil, but it is beautifully crafted. There is poetry in every line. Weir took me on a journey and surprised me. His narrator, who breaks the literary equivalent of the ‘4th wall’ to address us throughout the novel, is quite an enigma. Unreliable narrators are so much more painfully realistic than reliable ones!
Weir’s narrator takes us on a journey, that amid the surprises (and a token ending in BC that seemed all about qualifying for grants or awards!) leads to contemplation of evil and spirituality. He may break the contract (see what you think!) but he’s too interesting for you to be concerned.
What literary journeys have you had to abandon? What writer broke the contract and made you so irritated that you couldn’t go on?
Share this: