Alexandros of Macedonia aka Alexander the Great. Warrior. Emperor.
What we know of him from history reflects his excellent understanding of the strategies of war, his passionate nature, the strength of his character, his knowledge of power and how to manipulate it, his charisma.
How to translate that for a modern audience in a way that makes him an entertaining character, but is somewhat true to history? The thing about writing is, that we can re-interpret historical truth. We can manipulate facts into fantasy, and so we do.
My Xandros likely bears little resemblance to the historical figure, whom I imagine was actually much more brutal than my version. Mine is full of passion and dedication to his task, but does so with humour. He does know how to manipulate and intimidate, and uses those skills on the other men, in particular. It’s a worthy ability.
I think the real Alexandros had a dark spirit. According to Annabel Lyon’s research for her novel The Golden Mean, bred from birth to his role, blooded at an early age, it is likely Alexandros spent most of his life in a state of Post-traumatic Stress. If not, he was psychopathic or sadistic. Considering he was adored by his men, I think that is unlikely.
I’ve seen PTSD up close over the years. It is a debilitating condition that can make emotions volatile. Power battles insecurity. Fear battles rage. On the surface, a vision of self-control must be observed by all. It reveals a deeply conflicted character, a frail human who is never safe to reveal his frailty.
When you know there is a tender heart beneath the bristling exterior, you can try to reach it. I hope the Xandros that I’ve written shows something of this dichotomy. Can the reader feel his heart beneath his bravado? Can you?